| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
17/02/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
17/02/2017 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
SANTOS, D.S.; SILVA, C.B.C.; ARAÚJO, V. O.; SOUZA, M. DE F.; LACERDA-LUCENA, P. B.; SIMOES, S.V.D.; RIET-CORREA, F.; LUCENA, R.B. |
|
Afiliación : |
DANIELLE S. SANTOS, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil; CAIO C. B. SILVA, Veterinary Hospital, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil; VALBER O. ARAÚJO, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil; MARÍA DE FÁTIMA SOUZA, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil; PATRICIA B. LACERDA-LUCENA, Integrated Doctoral Program of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil; SARA V.D. SIMOES, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil; Veterinary Hospital, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, Integrated Doctoral Program of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil; Veterinary Hospital, Federal University of Campina Grande, Patos, Paraíba, Brazil; INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; RICARDO B. LUCENA, Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil; Veterinary Hospital, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Short communication: Primary photosensitization caused by ingestion of Froelichia humboldtiana by dairy goats. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Toxicon, 2017, v. 125, p. 65-69. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.11.258 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 9 October 2016 / Received in revised form / 22 November 2016 / Accepted 23 November 2016 / Available online 24 November 2016 |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
This study aimed to describe the first report of an outbreak of primary photosensitization in dairy goats caused by Froelichia humboldtiana. The disease occurred from March to May 2014, in a mixed flock of 15 Saanen, Alpine, and crossbred lactating goats. The entire flock was affected; however, the Saanen and cross-bred goats developed more severe lesions, and their milk production decreased by as much as 75%. Lesions were progressive and consisted of skin hyperemia, edema, and necrosis, especially in depigmented areas. An experimental study with two goats resulted in photodermatitis, similar to that observed in the natural cases, 10?14 days after the beginning of plant ingestion. Serum activities of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and -glutamyltransferase (GGT) and, direct, indirect, and total bilirubin serum concentrations were within the normal ranges. In conclusion, F. humboldtiana causes primary photosensitization in goats with a negative impact on milk production.
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
|
Palabras claves : |
GOAT DISEASE; LOW MILK PRODUCTION; PHOTODERMATITIS; SKIN NECROSIS. |
|
Thesagro : |
CABRAS; ENFERMEDADES DE LOS ANIMALES; NECROSIS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02089naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1056671
005 2017-02-17
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.11.258$2DOI
100 1 $aSANTOS, D.S.
245 $aShort communication$bPrimary photosensitization caused by ingestion of Froelichia humboldtiana by dairy goats.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
500 $aArticle history: Received 9 October 2016 / Received in revised form / 22 November 2016 / Accepted 23 November 2016 / Available online 24 November 2016
520 $aABSTRACT. This study aimed to describe the first report of an outbreak of primary photosensitization in dairy goats caused by Froelichia humboldtiana. The disease occurred from March to May 2014, in a mixed flock of 15 Saanen, Alpine, and crossbred lactating goats. The entire flock was affected; however, the Saanen and cross-bred goats developed more severe lesions, and their milk production decreased by as much as 75%. Lesions were progressive and consisted of skin hyperemia, edema, and necrosis, especially in depigmented areas. An experimental study with two goats resulted in photodermatitis, similar to that observed in the natural cases, 10?14 days after the beginning of plant ingestion. Serum activities of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and -glutamyltransferase (GGT) and, direct, indirect, and total bilirubin serum concentrations were within the normal ranges. In conclusion, F. humboldtiana causes primary photosensitization in goats with a negative impact on milk production. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
650 $aCABRAS
650 $aENFERMEDADES DE LOS ANIMALES
650 $aNECROSIS
653 $aGOAT DISEASE
653 $aLOW MILK PRODUCTION
653 $aPHOTODERMATITIS
653 $aSKIN NECROSIS
700 1 $aSILVA, C.B.C.
700 1 $aARAÚJO, V. O.
700 1 $aSOUZA, M. DE F.
700 1 $aLACERDA-LUCENA, P. B.
700 1 $aSIMOES, S.V.D.
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
700 1 $aLUCENA, R.B.
773 $tToxicon, 2017$gv. 125, p. 65-69.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
09/09/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
30/09/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
FALZON, L.C.; O´NEILL, T.J.; MENZIES, P.I.; PEREGRINE, A.S.; JONES-BITTON, A.; VANLEEUWEN, J.; MEDEROS, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
AMERICA ESTHER MEDEROS SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with anthelmintic resistance in sheep. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014, v. 117, p. 388-402. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.07.003 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 5 March 2014; Received in revised form 27 May 2014; Accepted 3 July 2014. |
|
Contenido : |
Background: Anthelmintic drugs have been widely used in sheep as a cost-effective meansfor gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) control. However, growing anthelmintic resistance(AHR) has created a compelling need to identify evidence-based management recommen-dations that reduce the risk of further development and impact of AHR.Objective: To identify, critically assess, and synthesize available data from primary researchon factors associated with AHR in sheep.Methods: Publications reporting original observational or experimental research on selectedfactors associated with AHR in sheep GINs and published after 1974, were identified throughtwo processes. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Agricola, CAB) and Web of Science (acollection of databases) were searched for potentially relevant publications. Additional pub-lications were identified through consultation with experts, manual search of referencesof included publications and conference proceedings, and information solicited from smallruminant practitioner list-serves. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for rel-evance. Relevant publications were assessed for risk of systematic bias. Where sufficientdata were available, random-effects Meta-Analyses (MAs) were performed to estimate thepooled Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of AHR for factors reported in?2 publications.Results: Of the 1712 abstracts screened for eligibility, 131 were deemed relevant for fullpublication review. Thirty publications describing 25 individual studies (15 observationalstudies, 7 challenge trials, and 3 controlled trials) were included in the qualitative synthesisand assessed for systematic bias. Unclear (i.e. not reported, or unable to assess) or high riskof selection bias and confounding bias was found in 93% (14/15) and 60% (9/15) of theobservational studies, respectively, while unclear risk of selection bias was identified in allof the trials. Ten independent studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, and MAswere performed for five factors. Only high frequency of treatment was a significant riskfactor (OR = 4.39; 95% CI = 1.59, 12.14), while the remaining 4 variables were marginallysignificant: mixed-species grazing (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 0.66, 4.07); flock size (OR = 1.02; 95%CI = 0.97, 1.07); use of long-acting drug formulations (OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 0.79, 10.24); anddrench-and-shift pasture management (OR = 4.08; 95% CI = 0.75, 22.16). MenosBackground: Anthelmintic drugs have been widely used in sheep as a cost-effective meansfor gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) control. However, growing anthelmintic resistance(AHR) has created a compelling need to identify evidence-based management recommen-dations that reduce the risk of further development and impact of AHR.Objective: To identify, critically assess, and synthesize available data from primary researchon factors associated with AHR in sheep.Methods: Publications reporting original observational or experimental research on selectedfactors associated with AHR in sheep GINs and published after 1974, were identified throughtwo processes. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Agricola, CAB) and Web of Science (acollection of databases) were searched for potentially relevant publications. Additional pub-lications were identified through consultation with experts, manual search of referencesof included publications and conference proceedings, and information solicited from smallruminant practitioner list-serves. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for rel-evance. Relevant publications were assessed for risk of systematic bias. Where sufficientdata were available, random-effects Meta-Analyses (MAs) were performed to estimate thepooled Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of AHR for factors reported in?2 publications.Results: Of the 1712 abstracts screened for eligibility, 131 were deemed relevant for fullpublication review. Thirty publications... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
DRENCH RESISTANCE; EVIDENCE-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS; GASTRO-INTESTINAL NEMATODES; MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS. |
|
Thesagro : |
OVINOS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03419naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1050071
005 2019-09-30
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.07.003$2DOI
100 1 $aFALZON, L.C.
245 $aA systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with anthelmintic resistance in sheep.
260 $c2014
500 $aArticle history: Received 5 March 2014; Received in revised form 27 May 2014; Accepted 3 July 2014.
520 $aBackground: Anthelmintic drugs have been widely used in sheep as a cost-effective meansfor gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) control. However, growing anthelmintic resistance(AHR) has created a compelling need to identify evidence-based management recommen-dations that reduce the risk of further development and impact of AHR.Objective: To identify, critically assess, and synthesize available data from primary researchon factors associated with AHR in sheep.Methods: Publications reporting original observational or experimental research on selectedfactors associated with AHR in sheep GINs and published after 1974, were identified throughtwo processes. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Agricola, CAB) and Web of Science (acollection of databases) were searched for potentially relevant publications. Additional pub-lications were identified through consultation with experts, manual search of referencesof included publications and conference proceedings, and information solicited from smallruminant practitioner list-serves. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for rel-evance. Relevant publications were assessed for risk of systematic bias. Where sufficientdata were available, random-effects Meta-Analyses (MAs) were performed to estimate thepooled Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of AHR for factors reported in?2 publications.Results: Of the 1712 abstracts screened for eligibility, 131 were deemed relevant for fullpublication review. Thirty publications describing 25 individual studies (15 observationalstudies, 7 challenge trials, and 3 controlled trials) were included in the qualitative synthesisand assessed for systematic bias. Unclear (i.e. not reported, or unable to assess) or high riskof selection bias and confounding bias was found in 93% (14/15) and 60% (9/15) of theobservational studies, respectively, while unclear risk of selection bias was identified in allof the trials. Ten independent studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, and MAswere performed for five factors. Only high frequency of treatment was a significant riskfactor (OR = 4.39; 95% CI = 1.59, 12.14), while the remaining 4 variables were marginallysignificant: mixed-species grazing (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 0.66, 4.07); flock size (OR = 1.02; 95%CI = 0.97, 1.07); use of long-acting drug formulations (OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 0.79, 10.24); anddrench-and-shift pasture management (OR = 4.08; 95% CI = 0.75, 22.16).
650 $aOVINOS
653 $aDRENCH RESISTANCE
653 $aEVIDENCE-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS
653 $aGASTRO-INTESTINAL NEMATODES
653 $aMANAGEMENT PRACTICES
653 $aQUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS
700 1 $aO´NEILL, T.J.
700 1 $aMENZIES, P.I.
700 1 $aPEREGRINE, A.S.
700 1 $aJONES-BITTON, A.
700 1 $aVANLEEUWEN, J.
700 1 $aMEDEROS, A.
773 $tPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014$gv. 117, p. 388-402.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
